USPS
National Reassessment Program |
|
Reassessment Program back on track in Pacific Area
By Dan
Sullivan, 7/10/2006
If the Reassessment Program was ever on hold in the Pacific Area, as
postal managers claimed a few months ago, it's back on track now.
The program is being expanded to cover the San Diego District,
according to Rick Cornelius, San Diego Area Local APWU President.
Targeted offices could include the Tri-County, El Cajon, La Mesa and
SD Area Locals, he said.
Cornelius was
notified last Thursday by USPS District Manager John Platt that the
roundup of injured workers in associate offices would begin on July
10.
APWU Western Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez told
delegates to the May 18 California State APWU Convention that USPS
Vice President Al Iniquez and USPS Human Resources Manager Manuel
Botello had informed him the day before that the Reassessment
Program was being put on hold in the Pacific Area to allow the
Postal Service time to assess the impact of EEO complaints, Merit
Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals and grievances filed over
the controversial program.
But he also told the delegates, "I believe management like I
believe Bush."
The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured
workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation
and then retraining them for private sector jobs.
The program is being tested in the Western New York District and the
Pacific Area prior to implementing the program nationwide.
Cornelius has a personal web site containing information for injured
workers swept up in the Reassessment Program at
http://members.cox.net/unionrick/copa.htm
Dan Sullivan can be contacted at
dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com. |
USPS dragnet
continues to sweep up injured workers
By Dan
Sullivan, 7/06/2006
The Postal
Service's Ergonomic Risk Reduction Program (EERP)is premised on a
simple lie. As it says on page 2 of the slickly produced booklet
promoting EERP, "The Postal Service has a long history of attention
to ergonomics."
Forget about the letter sorting machines that destroyed a
generation of postal clerks' wrists and hands.
Pay no attention to the current automated letter and flat sorting
machines that are destroying another generation of workers shoulders
and backs.
"The Postal Service has a long history of attention to
ergonomics."
Which is like saying George Bush has a long history of attention
to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties.
Unfortunately for Barbara Brzozowski, this long history of
attention to ergonomics hasn't made the Postal Service a very safe
or secure place to work.
Last month the Buffalo, New York postal clerk was thrown out of
work under the Postal Service's Reassessment Program, a scheme to
dump injured workers on the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
(OWCP) rolls.
Her only crime appears to be getting hurt while working on one of
the ergonomically unsafe flat sorting machines at the General Mail
Facility in Buffalo that the USPS pays so much attention to.
Her injury was typical. She's worked 21 years for the Postal
Service and the repetitive lifting of 3rd class tubs of
mail had left her right shoulder a mess. In April 2003 she filed an
OWCP injury claim. After a year of therapy and light duty work, she
tried to go back to work on the flat sorting machines.
"Each time I attempted to go back to my job, though, the shoulder
area would swell and become inflamed again," she says.
So she was given a job verifying bank mail and mail for local box
holders on the night shift.
"Management
claimed they had nothing for me to do during the day, though they
had off-the-job injured employees working days."
Then in March 2005 the EERP Coordinator in Buffalo asked for
volunteers from the limited duty section to do some light office
work. Barb volunteered and got the job. Eventually she began helping
out the Safety Specialist and the Medical Emergency Response Team,
which shared an office with the EERP Coordinator.
Soon the work was keeping Barb busy eight hours a day.
But unknown to her, the Postal Service was already in the middle
of testing a new program to dump injured workers on the OWCP rolls
and have the Department of Labor train them for work outside the
Postal Service.
One of the first places the Postal Service began testing what it
called its Reassessment Program was in the Western New York
District, where Barb worked.
She didn't know it, but soon she would be nothing more than
damaged goods to postal bosses.
In December of 2005 the local APWU notified employees that the
Reassessment Program was coming to Buffalo. A few days later Barb
was told by postal bosses in charge of the program to go to her
doctor for an updated medical report.
Barb describes what happened next:
"In January I went to have my records updated and did not hear
another word until I got a letter saying to show up for a meeting
about the reassessment program. They don't interview you at all. Nor
do they contact any of your current supervisors to see where you are
working or if you're being productive."
Barb's meeting
was on June 5, 2006. She was met by Mary McNeill, the District boss
in charge of getting rid of injured workers, Manager of Distribution
Operations (MDO) Mike McMann and two other bosses. She was told
there was no work for her, handed some forms and told to complete
them and mail them back to the Postal Service.
Barb tried to
argue with them by pointing out the work she was doing and
questioning them about other work that might be available in Buffalo
and elsewhere. But the postal bosses had already made up their mind
and weren't much interested in what she had to say. After the
meeting, the bosses confiscated her badge and marched her out of the
building.
Since being shown the door, Barb has tried to use annual and sick
leave while waiting for her OWCP paper work to get processed. But so
far the bosses haven't acted on her leave request.
She's trying to use her leave after hearing that some other
injured workers are still waiting for their first compensation
checks more than seven weeks after being thrown out of work because
the postal bosses gave them the wrong information about which forms
to fill out.
"One of the other clerks sent her form in and OWCP sent her a
letter back asking her why the Post Office had sent her home," she
says.
She's not sure how many other workers injured on the job in
Buffalo and outlying stations have been dumped on OWCP so far.
"There were
six of us that went within the first two meetings for sure. I have
heard that quite a few were also let go at the stations but that is
just through stories that have trickled my way."
Of course the Postal Service isn't talking. Postal officials
haven't responded to requests for information under the Freedom of
Information Act and all questions have been referred to the unions,
which they say have been briefed on the outsourcing program.
Sue Carney is the APWU Director of Human Relations. But she
doesn't seem to know much more about the program than anyone else
outside the Postal Service.
Right now the Reassessment Program is being tested in the Western
New York Region and the Pacific Area. Final approval to go
nationwide with the program is expected soon.
"When it is approved, they do not expect a rapid expansion," Carney
says. "It is being estimated that two to three postal districts per
year will be reassessed."
In a recent email she wrote, "We are still raising
concerns/pointing to violations with USPS as it relates to this
program and our Step 4 dispute. Once I am comfortable that we have
all relative information and that it is accurate I anticipate
providing a summary report to the local/state presidents and
national field officers."
In the meantime, more and more injured workers like Barb
Brzozowski, whose only crime was getting hurt at work, are caught up
in the dragnet as managers use the Reassessment Program to quietly
sweep away their obligations to injured postal workers.
Dan Sullivan can be contacted at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com. |
Status of Pacific Area
Reassessment Program in Dispute
By Dan Sullivan, 6/23/2006
Omar Gonzalez, the
source for a story reporting that the USPS had put the Pacific Area
Reassessment Program on hold, isn't backing down from his claim
despite a denial made through the union by the postal boss in charge
of the program in Washington, D.C., Kevin McGovern.
Gonzalez, the APWU Western Region Coordinator, insists Pacific Area Human
Resources Manager Manuel Botello told him at a May 17 meeting that
the program had been temporarily halted in the area.
But McGovern told APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney that
Botello denies telling Gonzalez the program was put on hold.
The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured
workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation
and then retraining them for private sector jobs.
"I went back to review my notes taken on the 17th of May," Gonzalez
said in an email received yesterday. "At that meeting I was prepared
to discuss issues of Rehab Reassessment . . . It was Mr. Botello who
expressly stated, 'Oh, that is on hold pending review of the impact
of EEOs, MSPBs and grievances.' Of course, they deny it."
Gonzalez also said that a story of mine, which quoted him telling
delegates to the California APWU Convention on May 18 that the
program had been put on hold, failed to report that he also told
delegates "I believe management like I believe Bush."
In a June 22 posting on the web site 21cpw.com, Gonzalez
dismissed the USPS denial as hearsay, noting that the source of the
story, APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney, "said that USPS
Manager McGovern said that Botello said he denied telling Western
Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez the Rehab Reassessment project was
on hold."
The Postal Service has refused requests for interviews about the
Reassessment Program, referring all questions to the union, which
they say has been briefed on the project.
Gonzalez said he rejected a request from USPS Pacific Area
management that the two sides sit down and review general issues
arising from the controversial program instead of the union filing
multiple grievances.
"I informed them we needed to intervene not just review. I also
informed them the withdrawal of a limited duty job offer could
generate a grievance over violations of the Rehab Act, a grievance
over a violation of the ELM 540, a grievance over failure to make a
real effort to find work, a separate grievance over non
accommodation of deserving employee and a host of other related
issues."
Gonzalez believes the union must aggressively oppose the
Reassessment Program.
"Not only do we have to assist injured employees, fight dirty
management and their HQ bosses, but we must also educate able bodied
members that it is the rights of all employees we are fighting for,"
he wrote on 21cpw.com.
"The fact is we know we are under attack whether the attack is on
hold or not. We can't trust management will do the right thing."
Correction: In previous stories I referred to USPS Pacific Area
Human Resources Manager Manuel Botello as Manuel Vetello. |
USPS
denies Reassessment Program on hold in Pacific Area
By Dan Sullivan, 6/14/2006
The Postal Service has denied a report that its controversial
Reassessment Program has been temporarily halted in the Pacific
Area.
APWU Western Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez told delegates
attending the May 18 California State APWU Convention that USPS Vice
President Al Iniquez and USPS Human Resources Manager Manuel Vetello
had informed him the day before that the Reassessment Program was
put on hold in the Pacific Area to allow the Postal Service time to
assess the impact of EEO complaints, Merit Systems Protection Board
(MSPB) appeals and grievances filed over the controversial program.
Gonzalez' remarks were reported and posted on a number of postal
worker Internet sites last week.
But Kevin McGovern, the USPS Manager in charge of the program,
has told APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney that Iniquez and
Vetello deny telling Gonzalez the program was put on hold.
A spokesman for McGovern has referred all questions about the
Reassessment Program to the American Postal Workers Union.
Gonzalez was not available for comment today.
The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured
workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation
and then retraining them for private sector jobs.
The project is being tested in the Western New York Region and
the Pacific Area.
The Postal Service is still waiting on final approval from USPS
Labor Relations Vice President Anthony Vegliante before going
nationwide with the program, according to Carney.
"When it is approved, they do not expect a rapid expansion," she
says. "It is being estimated that two to three postal districts per
year will be reassessed."
At that rate it could take 10 to 15 years before the program
reaches all 33 postal districts in the country.
Carney says the Postal Service has promised to notify the union
when the nationwide Reassessment Program is approved and "when a
schedule is formalized."
Contact Dan Sullivan at
dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com |
Laid
off injured worker says, "It can happen to anyone"
By Dan Sullivan
The piece of vinyl siding was hidden beneath 3 inches of snow when
Mike Vinci accidentally found it while delivering mail in Caledonia,
NY.
It was like stepping on a sheet of ice.
"My feet went straight up in the air," he remembers. " Like an
idiot, I hung onto the mail and landed on my elbow."
Mike finished his mail route that day. But the pain wouldn't go
away.
"I worked for almost a year with shoulder and neck pain, not
knowing I had damaged two discs in my neck and partially tore my
Achilles tendon in my left ankle.
"I went out of work in February of 1992. It took eight months to
even get an OWCP claim number and my first comp check. I had $75 to
my name."
Mike had more than money problems.
It turns out he needed surgeries to repair his ankle and neck.
But, like the wheels of justice, the bureaucracy moves slowly. After
his ankle surgery, it took another three years to get approval from
the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) for surgery to
fuse his 4th and 5th and 6th and 7th
cervical discs.
His days as a letter carrier were over.
But the Postal Service has always provided work for employees
hurt on the job. So when he recovered from his surgeries, Mike was
given a position as a part-time flexible clerk at the nearby Geneseo
post office. Eventually he worked his way into a regular position.
His work involved the usual clerks' duties, sorting and
distributing letters and flats, clearing carriers and handling
accountable mail. Mike has done everything, in fact, except work the
window, where the college kids often bring in large parcels too
heavy for him to lift because of his medical restrictions.
The story would end here, if the Postal Service hadn't come up
with a scheme to get rid of injured workers like Mike.
Called the Reassessment Program, the plan is being tested in the
Western New York District and a couple other areas of the country.
The purpose of the program is to cull injured workers from the
payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation and then retraining
them for private sector jobs.
Mike got his walking papers on May 24, when it took five postal
bosses coming down from the Western New York District Office in
Buffalo to tell him he was no longer needed.
"A mail carrier had to come in off the street to take over my
duties delivering all of the guaranteed overnight mail so that I
could attend the meeting," Mike says.
"They took my badge and walked me out the door. It was 2:00 p.m.
They don't even let you say goodbye to your friends."
The Geneseo Postmaster, Tammy Kelley, disagreed with the big
shots who said there wasn't any work for Mike.
But what did she know? She was only looking out for Geneseo and
wasn't able to see the big picture.
Tammy insisted to them that, not only was I doing a great job
and an asset to the office, but the work was there for me to do and
had not changed. She also emphasized that I was included in the
office budget hours, compiled by them, and that the office had made
budget last year
and is continuing to do so."
For obvious reasons, Postmaster Kelley was reluctant to speak
about Mike's situation.
"I can't really say too much, except this is all new. It's beyond
me. It involves staffing decisions by higher-ups," the Postmaster
says.
But she wasn't reluctant to praise Mike's work ethic.
"Oh, Mike was an excellent worker. I can tell you that."
The bosses at postal headquarters who came up with the
Reassessment Program have been mum about the scheme, referring all
questions to the American Postal Workers Union, which they say has
been briefed on the outsourcing program.
According to APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney, the Postal
Service claims it wants all limited duty and rehabilitation jobs to
consist of "necessary work," not make-work assignments.
So it seems like an obvious question to ask: Why dump Mike Vinci
back on Workers' Compensation when the Geneseo Postmaster has plenty
of real work for him to do?
The postal big shot who apparently decided that Mike wasn't
needed at the Geneseo post office is Mary McNeill. She has an
important title: Western New York District Manager of Injury
Compensation.
Mary wasn't in her office when I called to ask why Mike was put
off the clock and unceremoniously shown the door. Or why it took 5
postal bosses to deliver the news. The person who answered her phone
said she was on the road doing reassessment interviews.
I have to assume she must be quite busy trying to help other
injured workers, because she hasn't returned my call.
Mike is now 54 years old and in 11 months he'll be eligible to
retire. Until then he's going to fight to get his job back.
He's written his Congressman and filed a grievance with the
American Postal Workers Union over his dismissal.
As you can imagine, he doesn't have much good to say about the
Reassessment Program and the bureaucrats in charge of it. But he's
grateful to Geneseo Postmaster Tammy Kelley for "being truthful and
maybe jeopardizing her job" for him.
And he has this bit of advice for other postal workers who think
it can't happen to them:
"Even the people who aren't injured should be against this
program because anyone can get hurt at work.
"If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone."
Contact Dan Sullivan at
dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com. |
No Semblance
of Order in SD Reassessment Program
Reassignments 'random and haphazard,' says APWU
By Dan
Sullivan, 6/01/2006
Grievances filed by the San Diego Local of the American Postal
Workers Union (APWU) portray the Postal Service's Reassessment Pilot
Program as an unmitigated disaster, marked by arbitrary job
withdrawals and reassignments for hundreds of injured postal
employees and layoffs for 27 injured workers.
A copy of one of the grievances was obtained from San Diego Local
APWU President Rick Cornelius.
Officials at USPS headquarters in Washington, DC have refused to
speak about the Reassessment Program. But postal officials in San
Diego have responded to grievances filed there, telling the union
that it "no longer can afford to provide unnecessary 'make work' for
injured employees."
The Reassessment Pilot Program began in San Diego in October 2005
with medical reassessments of over 300 injured letter carriers,
clerk, motor vehicle service and maintenance craft employees.
All limited duty and permanent rehabilitation assignments were
withdrawn and reviewed. When jobs were reassigned, some employees
got their old jobs back while others were put in different
assignments. Twenty seven postal clerks were simply told there was
no longer any work available for them.
There was no rhyme or reason to the reassignments.
Instead of assigning injured workers new jobs by seniority,
postal bosses decided that those who had previously been offered
permanent rehabilitation jobs within a year of their injury would
get preference over those who were in limited duty assignments and
those who had been offered permanent rehabilitation jobs more than a
year after their injury.
Employees who did get jobs were offered work "not in seniority
order, date of injury order or any semblance of order" it says in
the grievance, but based on "a random and haphazard method" which
saw carriers getting clerk jobs while some clerks were left without
jobs at all.
One employee in San Diego suffered a serious shoulder injury in
2000 while working on an automated mail sorter.
Under postal regulations she was entitled to a permanent
rehabilitation job once she had reached what the Office of Workers'
Compensation calls 'maximum medical improvement' following her
injury. But the Postal Service never told her that, they just gave
her a job manually sorting mail and extended her limited duty
assignment month after month, year after year.
Since she had never been offered the permanent rehabilitation job
she was entitled to, she was one of the first to be culled from the
rolls on February 28.
Just like that, she was out of a job.
"Even on limited duty I always do what they tell me to and do the
best I can. My supervisor will even say that," she says, her words
trailing off. "It really hurts."
She is now drawing compensation and has met with a Department of
Labor (DOL) case worker who is setting up vocational testing for her
under the DOL's vocational rehabilitation program.
APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney says postal officials
have told the union that they want to offer rehabilitation jobs only
where there is "an operational need." That position contrasts with
the Postal Service's long held position, expressed in a past
arbitration case, that a rehabilitation job is "only created because
of the Postal Service's legal, contractual and regulatory obligation
to reassign or reemploy an employee who is injured on the job."
The union was also told that workers injured on the job will be
given priority in work assignments over employees needing light duty
work for off the job injuries.
Carney has prepared a document for local unions and injured
workers as a guideline for how to respond to the reassessment
program. The document is online at APWU.org on the Human Relations
Department page.
Anyone with information about the Postal Service's Reassessment
Program may contact me with assurances of confidentiality at
dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com. |
USPS
plans to cull unneeded injured workers
By Dan Sullivan, 5/25/2006
Within 2 to 4 weeks the Postal Service plans to begin implementing a
nation-wide program examining the status of workers injured on the
job who are presently on medical restrictions in limited duty and
permanent rehabilitation jobs. The goal of the program is to set up
a process to place injured workers off the clock on compensation and
then refer them to the Office of Workers' Compensation (OWCP) for
possible employment in the private sector if no work can be found
for them in the Postal Service.
Before that, though, Anthony Vegliante, USPS Vice President for
Labor Relations, must give final approval for the controversial
plan.
Not much is generally known about what the USPS is now calling
its 'National Reassessment Process.' Postal officials contacted at USPS headquarters refused to talk about it for this story, referring
all questions to the American Postal Workers Union, which they say
has been briefed about the program.
In its monthly magazine, the American Postal Worker, Sue Carney,
the union's Director of Human Relations, says that under the
Reassessment Program USPS will review medical documentation for
injured workers, request updated medical information if required and
then renew job offers or make new job offers "where adequate work is
available, based on operational needs." Where work isn't available,
injured workers will be put on compensation and referred to OWCP's
vocational rehabilitation program.
Carney also says that USPS representatives told the union in
March 2004 that the Postal Service had "partnered with OWCP in the
Long Island District regarding the Outplacement Program and that
OWCP was in agreement" with it. But OWCP officials told the union
that they "were not party to the USPS Outplacement Program" and a
spokesperson for Shelby Hallmark, Director of OWCP, also says the
agency has nothing to do with the Postal Service Reassessment
Program.
A spokesperson for the Department of Labor, which oversees OWCP,
confirms that the agency has nothing to do with the USPS outsourcing
plans.
"That's a Postal Service project," she says.
The Postal Service has yet to respond to a Freedom Of Information
Act (FOIA) request seeking details of the injured worker outsourcing
plan.
The program - first called the 'Outplacement Pilot Program' and
later the 'Reassessment Initiative' - has already been tested in at
least two places: In the Long Island District and in San Diego.
In April 2004 in the Long Island District, postal officials
attempted to withdraw limited duty work from 12 employees and put
them on the OWCP rolls where they would be paid compensation until
work could be found for them in the Postal Service or in the private
sector under OWCP's vocational rehabilitation program, a process
that can take up to two years.
Paul Hogrogrian, President of Mailhandlers Union Local 300, says
the outsourcing - then called the 'Outplacement Pilot Program' - was
mainly aimed at letter carriers.
"There were 3 or 4 mailhandlers in the program. The rest were
carriers. In all but one case, we got the Post Office to back off by
identifying work the mailhandlers could do within their
restrictions."
In the lone case where a mailhandler was placed on compensation
the union filed a grievance, which the Postal Service blocked from
going to arbitration by referring it to the national level of the
grievance-arbitration procedure. To date, no decision has been made
on that case.
In San Diego last year the name of the program had changed, but
not its goals. Now billed as the 'National Reassessment Process' the
program began with a look at 329 clerks in limited duty or permanent
rehabilitation jobs. On February 28 of this year postal managers
notified 27 of those injured clerks that there was no longer any
work for them in the Postal Service. The clerks were handed
compensation forms to fill out, stripped of their ID badges and
shown the door.
There are also unconfirmed reports that the outsourcing plan is
being tested in Pittsburgh and in Portland, Maine.
Under the
Federal Employee Compensation Act, OWCP provides workers'
compensation coverage to Federal and Postal workers for
employment-related injuries and occupational diseases. Benefits
include wage replacement, payment for medical care, and where
necessary, medical and vocational rehabilitation assistance in
returning to work.
Vocational rehabilitation services assist permanently disabled
injured workers return to work. These services include testing,
evaluation, counseling, guidance, training, placement and follow up.
According to published USPS documents, between May 2002 through
June 2005 the Postal Service "placed a total of 112 employees with
new employers under the OWCP Vocational Rehabilitation Program."
Actually it wasn't the Postal Service, but OWCP which provided
job placement under the Vocational Rehabilitation Program
Postmaster General John Potter told Congress on January 28, 2004,
that in 2003 "$704 million was paid in compensation and benefit
costs for employees with work-related injuries in either limited
duty or rehabilitation positions." That was about one-third of the
Postal Service workers' compensation costs in 2003.
As the outsourcing story unfolds, I will continue to report what
facts I can uncover. I have filed a Freedom of Information Request
to obtain USPS documents concerning the Reassessment Program and
have contacted national and local APWU officers around the country,
who haven't provided much information yet.
Anyone with information about the program, particularly any
clerks in San Diego, Pittsburgh or Portland who have been affected
by the program or any USPS managers or union officers with
information about the program, may contact me with assurances of
confidentiality at
dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com. |
|
|
|
|
|