Home > USPS National Reassessment Program

PostalMag.com

 
USPS National Reassessment Program
Reassessment Program back on track in Pacific Area
By Dan Sullivan, 7/10/2006

If the Reassessment Program was ever on hold in the Pacific Area, as postal managers claimed a few months ago, it's back on track now.

The program is being expanded to cover the San Diego District, according to Rick Cornelius, San Diego Area Local APWU President. Targeted offices could include the Tri-County, El Cajon, La Mesa and SD Area Locals, he said.

Cornelius was notified last Thursday by USPS District Manager John Platt that the roundup of injured workers in associate offices would begin on July 10.

APWU Western Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez told delegates to the May 18 California State APWU Convention that USPS Vice President Al Iniquez and USPS Human Resources Manager Manuel Botello had informed him the day before that the Reassessment Program was being put on hold in the Pacific Area to allow the Postal Service time to assess the impact of EEO complaints, Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals and grievances filed over the controversial program.

But he also told the delegates, "I believe management like I believe Bush."

The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation and then retraining them for private sector jobs.

The program is being tested in the Western New York District and the Pacific Area prior to implementing the program nationwide.

Cornelius has a personal web site containing information for injured workers swept up in the Reassessment Program at http://members.cox.net/unionrick/copa.htm

Dan Sullivan can be contacted at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com.

USPS dragnet continues to sweep up injured workers
By Dan Sullivan, 7/06/2006

The Postal Service's Ergonomic Risk Reduction Program (EERP)is premised on a simple lie. As it says on page 2 of the slickly produced booklet promoting EERP, "The Postal Service has a long history of attention to ergonomics."

Forget about the letter sorting machines that destroyed a generation of postal clerks' wrists and hands.

Pay no attention to the current automated letter and flat sorting machines that are destroying another generation of workers shoulders and backs.

"The Postal Service has a long history of attention to ergonomics."

Which is like saying George Bush has a long history of attention to the U.S. Constitution and civil liberties.

Unfortunately for Barbara Brzozowski, this long history of attention to ergonomics hasn't made the Postal Service a very safe or secure place to work.

Last month the Buffalo, New York postal clerk was thrown out of work under the Postal Service's Reassessment Program, a scheme to dump injured workers on the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) rolls.

Her only crime appears to be getting hurt while working on one of the ergonomically unsafe flat sorting machines at the General Mail Facility in Buffalo that the USPS pays so much attention to.

Her injury was typical. She's worked 21 years for the Postal Service and the repetitive lifting of 3rd class tubs of mail had left her right shoulder a mess. In April 2003 she filed an OWCP injury claim. After a year of therapy and light duty work, she tried to go back to work on the flat sorting machines.

"Each time I attempted to go back to my job, though, the shoulder area would swell and become inflamed again," she says.

So she was given a job verifying bank mail and mail for local box holders on the night shift.

"Management claimed they had nothing for me to do during the day, though they had off-the-job injured employees working days."

Then in March 2005 the EERP Coordinator in Buffalo asked for volunteers from the limited duty section to do some light office work. Barb volunteered and got the job. Eventually she began helping out the Safety Specialist and the Medical Emergency Response Team, which shared an office with the EERP Coordinator.

Soon the work was keeping Barb busy eight hours a day.

But unknown to her, the Postal Service was already in the middle of testing a new program to dump injured workers on the OWCP rolls and have the Department of Labor train them for work outside the Postal Service.

One of the first places the Postal Service began testing what it called its Reassessment Program was in the Western New York District, where Barb worked.

She didn't know it, but soon she would be nothing more than damaged goods to postal bosses.

In December of 2005 the local APWU notified employees that the Reassessment Program was coming to Buffalo. A few days later Barb was told by postal bosses in charge of the program to go to her doctor for an updated medical report.

Barb describes what happened next:

"In January I went to have my records updated and did not hear another word until I got a letter saying to show up for a meeting about the reassessment program. They don't interview you at all. Nor do they contact any of your current supervisors to see where you are working or if you're being productive."

Barb's meeting was on June 5, 2006. She was met by Mary McNeill, the District boss in charge of getting rid of injured workers, Manager of Distribution Operations (MDO) Mike McMann and two other bosses. She was told there was no work for her, handed some forms and told to complete them and mail them back to the Postal Service.

Barb tried to argue with them by pointing out the work she was doing and questioning them about other work that might be available in Buffalo and elsewhere. But the postal bosses had already made up their mind and weren't much interested in what she had to say. After the meeting, the bosses confiscated her badge and marched her out of the building.

Since being shown the door, Barb has tried to use annual and sick leave while waiting for her OWCP paper work to get processed. But so far the bosses haven't acted on her leave request.

She's trying to use her leave after hearing that some other injured workers are still waiting for their first compensation checks more than seven weeks after being thrown out of work because the postal bosses gave them the wrong information about which forms to fill out.

"One of the other clerks sent her form in and OWCP sent her a letter back asking her why the Post Office had sent her home," she says.

She's not sure how many other workers injured on the job in Buffalo and outlying stations have been dumped on OWCP so far.

"There were six of us that went within the first two meetings for sure. I have heard that quite a few were also let go at the stations but that is just through stories that have trickled my way."

Of course the Postal Service isn't talking. Postal officials haven't responded to requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act and all questions have been referred to the unions, which they say have been briefed on the outsourcing program.

Sue Carney is the APWU Director of Human Relations. But she doesn't seem to know much more about the program than anyone else outside the Postal Service.

Right now the Reassessment Program is being tested in the Western New York Region and the Pacific Area. Final approval to go nationwide with the program is expected soon.

"When it is approved, they do not expect a rapid expansion," Carney says. "It is being estimated that two to three postal districts per year will be reassessed."

In a recent email she wrote, "We are still raising concerns/pointing to violations with USPS as it relates to this program and our Step 4 dispute. Once I am comfortable that we have all relative information and that it is accurate I anticipate providing a summary report to the local/state presidents and national field officers."

In the meantime, more and more injured workers like Barb Brzozowski, whose only crime was getting hurt at work, are caught up in the dragnet as managers use the Reassessment Program to quietly sweep away their obligations to injured postal workers.

Dan Sullivan can be contacted at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com.

Status of Pacific Area Reassessment Program in Dispute
By Dan Sullivan, 6/23/2006

Omar Gonzalez, the source for a story reporting that the USPS had put the Pacific Area Reassessment Program on hold, isn't backing down from his claim despite a denial made through the union by the postal boss in charge of the program in Washington, D.C., Kevin McGovern.

Gonzalez, the APWU Western Region Coordinator, insists Pacific Area Human Resources Manager Manuel Botello told him at a May 17 meeting that the program had been temporarily halted in the area.

But McGovern told APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney that Botello denies telling Gonzalez the program was put on hold.

The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation and then retraining them for private sector jobs.

"I went back to review my notes taken on the 17th of May," Gonzalez said in an email received yesterday. "At that meeting I was prepared to discuss issues of Rehab Reassessment . . . It was Mr. Botello who expressly stated, 'Oh, that is on hold pending review of the impact of EEOs, MSPBs and grievances.' Of course, they deny it."

Gonzalez also said that a story of mine, which quoted him telling delegates to the California APWU Convention on May 18 that the program had been put on hold, failed to report that he also told delegates "I believe management like I believe Bush."

In a June 22 posting on the web site 21cpw.com, Gonzalez dismissed the USPS denial as hearsay, noting that the source of the story, APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney, "said that USPS Manager McGovern said that Botello said he denied telling Western Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez the Rehab Reassessment project was on hold."

The Postal Service has refused requests for interviews about the Reassessment Program, referring all questions to the union, which they say has been briefed on the project.

Gonzalez said he rejected a request from USPS Pacific Area management that the two sides sit down and review general issues arising from the controversial program instead of the union filing multiple grievances.

"I informed them we needed to intervene not just review. I also informed them the withdrawal of a limited duty job offer could generate a grievance over violations of the Rehab Act, a grievance over a violation of the ELM 540, a grievance over failure to make a real effort to find work, a separate grievance over non accommodation of deserving employee and a host of other related issues."

Gonzalez believes the union must aggressively oppose the Reassessment Program.

"Not only do we have to assist injured employees, fight dirty management and their HQ bosses, but we must also educate able bodied members that it is the rights of all employees we are fighting for," he wrote on 21cpw.com.

"The fact is we know we are under attack whether the attack is on hold or not. We can't trust management will do the right thing."

Correction: In previous stories I referred to USPS Pacific Area Human Resources Manager Manuel Botello as Manuel Vetello.

USPS denies Reassessment Program on hold in Pacific Area
By Dan Sullivan, 6/14/2006

The Postal Service has denied a report that its controversial Reassessment Program has been temporarily halted in the Pacific Area.

APWU Western Region Coordinator Omar Gonzalez told delegates attending the May 18 California State APWU Convention that USPS Vice President Al Iniquez and USPS Human Resources Manager Manuel Vetello had informed him the day before that the Reassessment Program was put on hold in the Pacific Area to allow the Postal Service time to assess the impact of EEO complaints, Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) appeals and grievances filed over the controversial program.

Gonzalez' remarks were reported and posted on a number of postal worker Internet sites last week.

But Kevin McGovern, the USPS Manager in charge of the program, has told APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney that Iniquez and Vetello deny telling Gonzalez the program was put on hold.

A spokesman for McGovern has referred all questions about the Reassessment Program to the American Postal Workers Union.

Gonzalez was not available for comment today.

The purpose of the Reassessment Program is to cull injured workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation and then retraining them for private sector jobs.

The project is being tested in the Western New York Region and the Pacific Area.

The Postal Service is still waiting on final approval from USPS Labor Relations Vice President Anthony Vegliante before going nationwide with the program, according to Carney.

"When it is approved, they do not expect a rapid expansion," she says. "It is being estimated that two to three postal districts per year will be reassessed."

At that rate it could take 10 to 15 years before the program reaches all 33 postal districts in the country.

Carney says the Postal Service has promised to notify the union when the nationwide Reassessment Program is approved and "when a schedule is formalized."

Contact Dan Sullivan at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com

Laid off injured worker says, "It can happen to anyone"
By Dan Sullivan

The piece of vinyl siding was hidden beneath 3 inches of snow when Mike Vinci accidentally found it while delivering mail in Caledonia, NY.

It was like stepping on a sheet of ice.

"My feet went straight up in the air," he remembers. " Like an idiot, I hung onto the mail and landed on my elbow."

Mike finished his mail route that day. But the pain wouldn't go away.

"I worked for almost a year with shoulder and neck pain, not knowing I had damaged two discs in my neck and partially tore my Achilles tendon in my left ankle.

"I went out of work in February of 1992. It took eight months to even get an OWCP claim number and my first comp check. I had $75 to my name."

Mike had more than money problems.

It turns out he needed surgeries to repair his ankle and neck. But, like the wheels of justice, the bureaucracy moves slowly. After his ankle surgery, it took another three years to get approval from the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) for surgery to fuse his 4th and 5th and 6th and 7th cervical discs.

His days as a letter carrier were over.

But the Postal Service has always provided work for employees hurt on the job. So when he recovered from his surgeries, Mike was given a position as a part-time flexible clerk at the nearby Geneseo post office. Eventually he worked his way into a regular position.

His work involved the usual clerks' duties, sorting and distributing letters and flats, clearing carriers and handling accountable mail. Mike has done everything, in fact, except work the window, where the college kids often bring in large parcels too heavy for him to lift because of his medical restrictions.

The story would end here, if the Postal Service hadn't come up with a scheme to get rid of injured workers like Mike.

Called the Reassessment Program, the plan is being tested in the Western New York District and a couple other areas of the country. The purpose of the program is to cull injured workers from the payroll by dumping them on Workers' Compensation and then retraining them for private sector jobs.

Mike got his walking papers on May 24, when it took five postal bosses coming down from the Western New York District Office in Buffalo to tell him he was no longer needed.

"A mail carrier had to come in off the street to take over my duties delivering all of the guaranteed overnight mail so that I could attend the meeting," Mike says.

"They took my badge and walked me out the door. It was 2:00 p.m. They don't even let you say goodbye to your friends."

The Geneseo Postmaster, Tammy Kelley, disagreed with the big shots who said there wasn't any work for Mike.

But what did she know? She was only looking out for Geneseo and wasn't able to see the big picture.

Tammy insisted to them that, not only was I doing a great job and an asset to the office, but the work was there for me to do and had not changed. She also emphasized that I was included in the office budget hours, compiled by them, and that the office had made budget last year and is continuing to do so."

For obvious reasons, Postmaster Kelley was reluctant to speak about Mike's situation.

"I can't really say too much, except this is all new. It's beyond me. It involves staffing decisions by higher-ups," the Postmaster says.

But she wasn't reluctant to praise Mike's work ethic.

"Oh, Mike was an excellent worker. I can tell you that."

The bosses at postal headquarters who came up with the Reassessment Program have been mum about the scheme, referring all questions to the American Postal Workers Union, which they say has been briefed on the outsourcing program.

According to APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney, the Postal Service claims it wants all limited duty and rehabilitation jobs to consist of "necessary work," not make-work assignments.

So it seems like an obvious question to ask: Why dump Mike Vinci back on Workers' Compensation when the Geneseo Postmaster has plenty of real work for him to do?

The postal big shot who apparently decided that Mike wasn't needed at the Geneseo post office is Mary McNeill. She has an important title: Western New York District Manager of Injury Compensation.

Mary wasn't in her office when I called to ask why Mike was put off the clock and unceremoniously shown the door. Or why it took 5 postal bosses to deliver the news. The person who answered her phone said she was on the road doing reassessment interviews.

I have to assume she must be quite busy trying to help other injured workers, because she hasn't returned my call.

Mike is now 54 years old and in 11 months he'll be eligible to retire. Until then he's going to fight to get his job back.

He's written his Congressman and filed a grievance with the American Postal Workers Union over his dismissal.

As you can imagine, he doesn't have much good to say about the Reassessment Program and the bureaucrats in charge of it. But he's grateful to Geneseo Postmaster Tammy Kelley for "being truthful and maybe jeopardizing her job" for him.

And he has this bit of advice for other postal workers who think it can't happen to them:

"Even the people who aren't injured should be against this program because anyone can get hurt at work.

"If it can happen to me, it can happen to anyone."

Contact Dan Sullivan at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com.

No Semblance of Order in SD Reassessment Program
Reassignments 'random and haphazard,' says APWU

By Dan Sullivan, 6/01/2006

Grievances filed by the San Diego Local of the American Postal Workers Union (APWU) portray the Postal Service's Reassessment Pilot Program as an unmitigated disaster, marked by arbitrary job withdrawals and reassignments for hundreds of injured postal employees and layoffs for 27 injured workers.

A copy of one of the grievances was obtained from San Diego Local APWU President Rick Cornelius.

Officials at USPS headquarters in Washington, DC have refused to speak about the Reassessment Program. But postal officials in San Diego have responded to grievances filed there, telling the union that it "no longer can afford to provide unnecessary 'make work' for injured employees."

The Reassessment Pilot Program began in San Diego in October 2005 with medical reassessments of over 300 injured letter carriers, clerk, motor vehicle service and maintenance craft employees.

All limited duty and permanent rehabilitation assignments were withdrawn and reviewed. When jobs were reassigned, some employees got their old jobs back while others were put in different assignments. Twenty seven postal clerks were simply told there was no longer any work available for them.

There was no rhyme or reason to the reassignments.

Instead of assigning injured workers new jobs by seniority, postal bosses decided that those who had previously been offered permanent rehabilitation jobs within a year of their injury would get preference over those who were in limited duty assignments and those who had been offered permanent rehabilitation jobs more than a year after their injury.

Employees who did get jobs were offered work "not in seniority order, date of injury order or any semblance of order" it says in the grievance, but based on "a random and haphazard method" which saw carriers getting clerk jobs while some clerks were left without jobs at all.

One employee in San Diego suffered a serious shoulder injury in 2000 while working on an automated mail sorter.

Under postal regulations she was entitled to a permanent rehabilitation job once she had reached what the Office of Workers' Compensation calls 'maximum medical improvement' following her injury. But the Postal Service never told her that, they just gave her a job manually sorting mail and extended her limited duty assignment month after month, year after year.

Since she had never been offered the permanent rehabilitation job she was entitled to, she was one of the first to be culled from the rolls on February 28.

Just like that, she was out of a job.

"Even on limited duty I always do what they tell me to and do the best I can. My supervisor will even say that," she says, her words trailing off. "It really hurts."

She is now drawing compensation and has met with a Department of Labor (DOL) case worker who is setting up vocational testing for her under the DOL's vocational rehabilitation program.

APWU Human Relations Director Sue Carney says postal officials have told the union that they want to offer rehabilitation jobs only where there is "an operational need." That position contrasts with the Postal Service's long held position, expressed in a past arbitration case, that a rehabilitation job is "only created because of the Postal Service's legal, contractual and regulatory obligation to reassign or reemploy an employee who is injured on the job."

The union was also told that workers injured on the job will be given priority in work assignments over employees needing light duty work for off the job injuries.

Carney has prepared a document for local unions and injured workers as a guideline for how to respond to the reassessment program. The document is online at APWU.org on the Human Relations Department page.

Anyone with information about the Postal Service's Reassessment Program may contact me with assurances of confidentiality at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com.

USPS plans to cull unneeded injured workers
By Dan Sullivan, 5/25/2006

Within 2 to 4 weeks the Postal Service plans to begin implementing a nation-wide program examining the status of workers injured on the job who are presently on medical restrictions in limited duty and permanent rehabilitation jobs. The goal of the program is to set up a process to place injured workers off the clock on compensation and then refer them to the Office of Workers' Compensation (OWCP) for possible employment in the private sector if no work can be found for them in the Postal Service.

Before that, though, Anthony Vegliante, USPS Vice President for Labor Relations, must give final approval for the controversial plan.

Not much is generally known about what the USPS is now calling its 'National Reassessment Process.' Postal officials contacted at USPS headquarters refused to talk about it for this story, referring all questions to the American Postal Workers Union, which they say has been briefed about the program.

In its monthly magazine, the American Postal Worker, Sue Carney, the union's Director of Human Relations, says that under the Reassessment Program USPS will review medical documentation for injured workers, request updated medical information if required and then renew job offers or make new job offers "where adequate work is available, based on operational needs." Where work isn't available, injured workers will be put on compensation and referred to OWCP's vocational rehabilitation program.

Carney also says that USPS representatives told the union in March 2004 that the Postal Service had "partnered with OWCP in the Long Island District regarding the Outplacement Program and that OWCP was in agreement" with it. But OWCP officials told the union that they "were not party to the USPS Outplacement Program" and a spokesperson for Shelby Hallmark, Director of OWCP, also says the agency has nothing to do with the Postal Service Reassessment Program.

A spokesperson for the Department of Labor, which oversees OWCP, confirms that the agency has nothing to do with the USPS outsourcing plans.

"That's a Postal Service project," she says.

The Postal Service has yet to respond to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking details of the injured worker outsourcing plan.

The program - first called the 'Outplacement Pilot Program' and later the 'Reassessment Initiative' - has already been tested in at least two places: In the Long Island District and in San Diego.

In April 2004 in the Long Island District, postal officials attempted to withdraw limited duty work from 12 employees and put them on the OWCP rolls where they would be paid compensation until work could be found for them in the Postal Service or in the private sector under OWCP's vocational rehabilitation program, a process that can take up to two years.

Paul Hogrogrian, President of Mailhandlers Union Local 300, says the outsourcing - then called the 'Outplacement Pilot Program' - was mainly aimed at letter carriers.

"There were 3 or 4 mailhandlers in the program. The rest were carriers. In all but one case, we got the Post Office to back off by identifying work the mailhandlers could do within their restrictions."

In the lone case where a mailhandler was placed on compensation the union filed a grievance, which the Postal Service blocked from going to arbitration by referring it to the national level of the grievance-arbitration procedure. To date, no decision has been made on that case.

In San Diego last year the name of the program had changed, but not its goals. Now billed as the 'National Reassessment Process' the program began with a look at 329 clerks in limited duty or permanent rehabilitation jobs. On February 28 of this year postal managers notified 27 of those injured clerks that there was no longer any work for them in the Postal Service. The clerks were handed compensation forms to fill out, stripped of their ID badges and shown the door.

There are also unconfirmed reports that the outsourcing plan is being tested in Pittsburgh and in Portland, Maine.

Under the Federal Employee Compensation Act, OWCP provides workers' compensation coverage to Federal and Postal workers for employment-related injuries and occupational diseases. Benefits include wage replacement, payment for medical care, and where necessary, medical and vocational rehabilitation assistance in returning to work.

Vocational rehabilitation services assist permanently disabled injured workers return to work. These services include testing, evaluation, counseling, guidance, training, placement and follow up.

According to published USPS documents, between May 2002 through June 2005 the Postal Service "placed a total of 112 employees with new employers under the OWCP Vocational Rehabilitation Program."

Actually it wasn't the Postal Service, but OWCP which provided job placement under the Vocational Rehabilitation Program

Postmaster General John Potter told Congress on January 28, 2004, that in 2003 "$704 million was paid in compensation and benefit costs for employees with work-related injuries in either limited duty or rehabilitation positions." That was about one-third of the Postal Service workers' compensation costs in 2003.

As the outsourcing story unfolds, I will continue to report what facts I can uncover. I have filed a Freedom of Information Request to obtain USPS documents concerning the Reassessment Program and have contacted national and local APWU officers around the country, who haven't provided much information yet.

Anyone with information about the program, particularly any clerks in San Diego, Pittsburgh or Portland who have been affected by the program or any USPS managers or union officers with information about the program, may contact me with assurances of confidentiality at dan_sullivan9026@hotmail.com.

 

Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy

Copyright PostalMag.com, All Rights Reserved