To proponents
of privatizing the United States Postal Service, I offer the
following advice: Be careful for what you ask and check the water
before you take a plunge. Before you discount what I have to say,
take the time to read this article to its end. Then, disagree if
you wish but at least you will ponder a few facts before you
decide.
Currently,
every US citizen (or international visitor) within these 50 states
(including territories and far flung military outposts) can send a
greeting card or personal message that remains secure from prying
eyes and pilferage to any other resident or visitor for the same
nominal cost of 34 cents. Doctors, lawyers, merchants or chiefs
can send private information, advertising, company secrets, and
even documentation for receiving a patent for that same low rate.
If you’re a welfare mother, asking for help from your elected
representative (even from the President of the United States), or
a child trying to send a wish list to Santa Claus; your letter is
just as important and will get the same devoted attention as a
high-rolling corporate executive who may be sending an order or a
check for a new 2 million dollar yacht. These messages may be
forwarded as many times as necessary to reach the addressee, for
free.
Let’s take a
look at some alternative methods of communication. A local phone
call is free but long distance may be cost prohibitive for the
economically challenged. No matter the cost for the phone call, it
requires that you have phone service which averages close to a
dollar per day nationwide. If you can’t afford regular phone
service, you could use a pay phone for about 35 cents (more than a
stamp) or you can infringe on a neighbor who just may listen in on
your conversation. Or, you could use your employer’s phone. Your
lost work time and tying up a company phone line for a couple of
minutes will only cost your employer a little bit. I’m sure they
won’t mind (or monitor your call).
Some email
service is free. The only catch is that you need a computer, or at
least the use of one, that has an Internet connection. You could
use a computer at your public library but you may have to wait
your turn and the drive or bus ride to get there is still more
expensive than a stamp. Some ISPs offer free Internet service but
you have to buy that darned computer. Surely, an initial
investment of a few hundred dollars isn’t too much to ask poor
folks to pay, just so they can stay in touch with loved ones. But
wait, millions of US adults are still "off-line" and many are
completely computer illiterate. Do those people not have any right
to communicate?
Okay, so
let’s privatize the Postal Service anyway. I’m sure we could find
some fool who would have their company deliver a letter to your
military child stationed in Germany, Japan or Korea for the same
fee that they would charge to take a letter across the street in
Boston. Well, maybe not.
But even if
some great company can replace the Postal Service, you have to
consider the business model. A private company means owners
(stockholders) who demand a profit. Stockholders would not accept
a break-even organization like the United States Postal Service. A
modest 12.2 percent profit would match the average stock market
investment over the past 75 years. Surely, some genius CEO could
figure out a way to save 12.2 percent over night. That way postage
wouldn’t have to be increased to make the required profit.
Now, how
much would this genius CEO have to be paid? I doubt that we could
find anyone for the paltry $161,200 paid to the current PMG/CEO.
National CEO salary averages indicate that we might find someone
for this job for just under $3 million per year (plus a handful of
stock options). Additionally, subordinate executives would require
a commiserate remuneration about 3-6 times their current salaries.
Well, maybe we could raise postage rates just a few pennies.
Oh, lest we
forget. federal, state and local governments expect to receive
billions of dollars each year for vehicle licenses, gasoline,
property and sales taxes. Did someone mention federal corporate
income tax? That’s a mere 39% of taxable income. Add all these
together and our new private postal service will only have to
charge about 80 cents to clear the 34 cents per stamp that’s
currently required to break even. That’s not so bad.
Insurance
shouldn’t be a big problem. Lloyd’s of London could provide this
new postal corporate venture with liability insurance for a tidy
sum of several hundred million dollars each year. Sorry, a private
company just cannot be "self-insured" like the USPS.
A privately
owned postal company could also experience problems with unionized
workers. If unions and the US Postal Service can’t reach a pay
agreement, that disagreement is now taken to binding arbitration
without any threat of strike. Of course, it would be perfectly
legal for unions to strike or boycott a privately owned mail
delivery company. Do you think customers would miss their 6-day a
week mail delivery if unions had to strike for a few weeks (or
months) to force a pay raise at the end of each 3-year contract?
Local strikes in big cities are also possible to obtain locale pay
for high cost area employees. I’m sure that mail could be stored
and delivered after those matters were worked out.
All in all,
I think your vision of a private postal service is a bit myopic at
best. And at worst? You figure it out. |